Author: Guest Post

  • I Am, Because You Are: Unbridled Humanity and the Pandemic

    I Am, Because You Are: Unbridled Humanity and the Pandemic

    By Yusuff Uthman Adekola

    humanity is a phenomenon hinged on shared existence, slung like a bag around the firm shoulders of responsibility, of trust, of love, of compassion and of honour.

    The first time I would open my eyes, let out a cry of life and be called a human, I did not do it alone. There were other humans around me: first, my mother, half-dead in the throes of coma after a caesarean; then the doctors and nurses, with their anxiety gently thawing; and my father, somewhere not too far from the operating theatre, his mind shaking, certainly, with uncertainty, and his lips leaking with prayers.

    There were others, too, whose physical bodies might not be there at the hospital, but whose minds, well wishes and concerns, must have roamed around as phantoms of nervousness: family, relatives, friends, acquaintances and neighbours, plus some others who must have thrown one or two words of prayer upon simply knowing someone was going to give birth.

    The period after my birth also came with its slice of rallying, as I still was not alone, and neither were my mother and my father, as there was my grandmother there to help my recuperating mother. There also came greetings here and there, visitations from far and wide, gifts around and everywhere, felicitations, congratulations, and then the naming ceremony that would finally bring everyone together under the pitched tent of celebration.

    And as is the case with naming ceremonies in our culture, many people were around, smiling, praying, spending and spraying money with joy, eating and drinking as they liked, meeting other people and chatting with friends and family they had not seen for long. Of course, it did not really matter your relationship with whoever was doing the ceremony or who came; everyone present was meant to be a brimming tumbler, a river in full spate, filled with joy. After all, it was, and this is, Africa, and the spirit is supposed to be selfless and communal.

    Talking of the spirit of selflessness and communal existence, there comes to mind the popular African philosophy of Ubuntu known to have originated from the Southern African languages of Zulu and Xhosa. Ubuntu has been translated as ‘I am, because you/we are’ and understood to mean that ‘a person is a person through other persons’. What this connotes, in other words, is that humanity is a phenomenon hinged on shared existence, slung like a bag around the firm shoulders of responsibility, of trust, of love, of compassion and of honour.

    As such, it holds true that a human is truly human only through his/her display of humanity towards others. Obviously, that was what everyone who had tended to my birth in their unique ways had shown: their humanity; that ‘I’ was another human ushered to the world, because ‘they’ were my precursors ready to welcome me with a shower of confetti that was their heartiness, their love, their care.

    This technically comes as a pure opposite to René Descartes’s individualistic, self-centric ‘cogito, ergo sum’ meaning ‘I think, therefore I am’, which suggests that the human existence is no other than a matter of the self, a matter of personal thoughts and doings alone. Had the people followed this philosophy of Descartes’s, my birth would not have been greeted with such collective enthusiasm and show of care. Thus, Ubuntu is further affirmed as a consideration of the self in relation to others, the reality of being human only through being humane to others.

    Interestingly, in many different ways, the world has acknowledged the ubiquitous significance of the statement ‘I am, because you are’. One of such acknowledgments is the technological description of the world as a global village, denoting that humanity is a single community bound by mutual interactions. In the same vein, we find that the Danish people for instance are known to maintain a harmonious societal foundation based on trust, where one Dane presumes the other to be trustworthy, and this, one can convincingly say, has proven to be a reason why Denmark remains at the top of the world’s least corrupt societies. In the Yoruba philosophy as well, every human is seen as an inevitable support system to the other; and so they would say ‘ènìyàn laṣọọ̀ mi’ roughly translated as ‘humanity is my cloth’; so, on various attestable fronts, the Yoruba people are arguably known for hospitality.

    To bring things into better perspective, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has exemplified a focal point for what it means for anyone to say and mean to say ‘I am, because you are’. Just as the virus is blind to boundary, skin, tongue or class, and is currently the cause of over 800,000 deaths worldwide, different nations of the world, organisations and individuals have continued to provide humanitarian supports in cash and kind. The foremost in this case are the healthcare workers who are at the very front line of the battle as though they are immune to contracting the virus or probably are themselves the vaccine to treat it.

    Sadly, according to a report by Aljazeera (July 13, 2020), Amnesty International has noted that over 3,000 health workers have said hello to the ghosts, in the wake of their response to the pandemic. In spite of this fact, and even coupled with the unfavourable working conditions experienced by many of them, these people remain true to their humanitarian calling, unabashed as they wear humanity still as their clothes, further pronouncing through their actions the principle of Ubuntu, that they are because we all are and we all are because they are. Even more so, recent economic realities across the globe have come with harsh frowns, as the International Momentary Fund (IMF) in fact submits that countries of the world have spent an estimated total amount of money rising above $9 trillion in response to the corona virus crisis.

    All of this goes to show that while the world continues to ail, the denizens of it have found succour in hailing their intrinsically human interconnectedness. The virus reminds us all that indeed an injury to one of us is an injury to all of us, and that taking care of oneself is taking care of others, and vice versa. In relation to this, good public health becomes ensured through personal well-being informed by collective consciousness, as everyone follows the necessary guidelines towards reducing the spread of the virus; everyone therefore simply enacts the values of Ubuntu which says ‘I am, because we are’, since every person’s safety or unsafety from the virus is dependent on another’s infection by it.

    Indeed, there is no doubting the truth in John Donne’s musing, when he says in a poem of his that ‘No man is an island entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main…’ Perhaps it gets even more cogent to add that: no man is a high lord all by himself except that every other man helps to hold him high.

    Definitely, this piece of writing itself is, only because the readers are; therefore, Ubuntu remains a compass that is all-encompassing for all.

    Yusuff Uthman Adekola is a Nigerian poet.

  • BEFORE YOU SAY NO… [or: I AM RIGHT; YOU ARE WRONG]

    BEFORE YOU SAY NO… [or: I AM RIGHT; YOU ARE WRONG]

    By Tope Lanre Bello

    The human world manifests the same reality and will not seek our permission to celebrate itself in the magnificence of its endless varieties. Civility is a sensible attribute in this kind of world we have; narrowness of heart and mind is not – Chinua Achebe, 1996.

    Achebe’s speech quoted above is a call to reject the notion of universality of experience. More than twenty years after the late Nigeria’s most celebrated novelist delivered the speech, a lot has changed to alter our perception of the reality of the world – most importantly, Information Communication Technology.

    ICT has greatly enhanced globalisation and the idea of the world as a global village is increasingly becoming daring. The internet has enriched our appreciation of differences in cultures and beliefs. Unlike Alexander, the Great who erroneously believed he had conquered the whole world while in actual fact, the farthest he had got was India; our generation cannot afford to bask in such ignorance because of the enormous pool of information, facilitated by technology, available at our disposal.

    The world is now in our palm. We cannot feign ignorance to the fact that there are around eight billion human beings in the world with several differing cultural backgrounds and experiences which have informed their beliefs, aspirations and worldview.

    Yet, despite the foregoing, most people still live lives, think and act as if the physical and social spaces they interact with are the whole world. When confronted with seemingly improbable arguments or points of view, they are prone to easily, even promptly, say ‘nay’.

    A Yoruba proverb says ‘he that has not got to another father’s farm will cheerfully boast that his father has the largest farm in the universe.’ This is the danger of a ‘single story, ‘borrowing from the title of Adichie’s famous speech. Had Adichie’s roommate been told by another American that English was the official language of Nigeria, she might have argued and said nay to a fact.

    I had been taught in Government class and at other platforms that the United States practised the presidential system of government and that the presidential system emphasises separation of power. I was therefore shocked the day my friend (name withheld) told me that the Vice President of the USA is also the president of the US Senate. I called him all sorts of nasty names ranging from ‘fool’ to ‘moron’ because as I thought then, the United States of America was the symbol of the democratic world. I was so sure of my correctness that I did not even bother to check the internet. The argument took place in 2015 and so, such arguments had already become needless because of the internet. I later checked: I was wrong; he was right.

    Notwithstanding the massive evidence available to our generation, many people have still not been able to comprehend the fact that the world is large and that universality of experience is a mirage. It is for this purpose that many are always quick to say ‘nay’ or counter an argument that they deem improbable. They seem not to be aware that the world is vast and that experiences differ. The lethal dimension of this “narrowness of heart,” using Achebe’s words, is what Nobel Laureate Soyinka attacks as “if you do not accept that I’m right, I have a right to kill you”.

    Narrowness of mind-set is mostly evident in the display of religiosity and this is a universal phenomenon, perhaps the only reality that is universal (besides death, of course!). From the Pharisees’ prejudice (in the Christian Bible) to the persecution of the earliest Christians to the Inquisition to Jihad to Crusades to modern day fundamentalism, what we have is the sentiment of extreme sense of rightness (of self) and wrongness (of the other).

    The most unfortunate dimension to these extremisms is the underlying notion of ‘I am right and I have a right to kill you if you do not share my view.’ And the question is how many lives have been lost to this barbarity? Yet, there are more than eight billion people in this world with differing religious views. The human world will not seek our permission to celebrate itself in the magnificence of its endless varieties, said Achebe. Our duty as a human race is to join in the celebration of the varieties of our reality. After all, do the English people not say variety is the spice of life?

    My argument is that we must not be too quick to discountenance another’s opinion, position or belief. The fact that the ‘self’ is right does not mean the ‘other’ is wrong. Sometimes, and, in fact, more often than not, reality is multifaceted. An Igbo proverb says, “when one thing stands, there is another thing standing beside it.” So rather than saying the ‘other’ is wrong, the most correct statement would be ‘I am right; you may be right as well.’ I do not, in any way, advocate that every proposition is correct.

    What I advocate is a little bit of hesitation before writing off an argument, a belief, an opinion or position. A little bit of research will make enormous sense. Everybody deserves the benefit of the doubt. In the case of metaphysical discourses, the best course to take is to celebrate our differences, creating for ourselves, therefore, unity in diversity

    *Bello is a social commentator and literary critic. The article was first published on his blog in 2019.